anyone else notice area percent kicking in around week 25
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: COA matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 18 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 19 people measuring the same thing…
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
the related substances line is where the story is
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing