GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about related substances until somebody posts a number — 34 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5k
c/coa·submitted 2 years ago by u/tomas_lehtinen

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about related substances until somebody posts a number

Discussionbranch of 9 comments

I have had 17 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 4 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February. The independent number came back 96.8% against a claimed…

Read the full submission and all 34 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 2 years ago
u/halima_boateng785 points·2 years ago

redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_balogun624 points·2 years ago

redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details

Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 98.7% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_jansen276 points·2 years ago

redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 87 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/certified_referenceQC124 points·2 years ago

the related substances line is where the story is

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_collectorarchivist103 points·2 years ago

purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lehtinenOP-5 points·2 years ago

purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]189 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_vermeulen78 points·2 years ago

axis labels included, always

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox29323 points·2 years ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/coa

How to read a certificate of analysis and what it does and does not tell you. Area% versus mass%, identity versus quantity, water content, related substances, acetate counterions, and the difference between a vendor-supplied COA and an independent test on the vial you actually received.

71kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/coa
c/coa rules
  1. Post the full document. Cropped COAs that hide the batch number or date get removed.
  2. Redact your own name and order id, not the vendor's batch details.
  3. No "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/coa_janitoru/purity_pedantu/coa_collectoru/certified_referenceu/first_hundred
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →