why does nobody talk about related substances
Right, the certificate of analysis question again, but with numbers this time. I have 9 data points over 14 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect…
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
Metadata check caught a COA that was created in a browser four months after the analysis date. Not evidence of fraud, but worth flagging to QYB.