[Question] how do you actually verify REDEFINE
Been lurking in c/cryptopay for about 12 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 52, 2.4mg, and REDEFINE is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 17 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know…
long-acting amylin is co-agonism, different satiety profile
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
This is correct. The co-agonism is real.
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
REDEFINE which arm?
long-acting amylin is CagriSema, different satiety profile
REDEFINE phase 2 readouts are interesting but 2 person cagrilintide is different from 2 trial cagrilintide.
Slight fix: the number was 98.0, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
long-acting amylin is co-agonism, different satiety profile
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 50 weeks to accept.
not approved anywhere, keep posts descriptive, not instructional
not approved anywhere, keep posts descriptive, not instructional
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.