GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
364
c/bpc157·posted 1 months ago by u/ayesha_erdogan

[Lab] SSA BPC — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2%

Lab Well Actually ×8

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.

I have been tracking BPC-157 against eGFR for 19 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.

Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.

tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.

520 up / 156 down77% upvoted20 commentsid ua53wg16 Jun 2026

20 comments

18 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/ruben_brandt57 points·1 months ago

Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ayesha_erdoganOP23 points·1 months ago

My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaplan_meier_kim48 points·1 months ago
ask your actual doctor, not us
replysharereportpermalink
u/signe_villalobos25 points·1 months ago

Crossposting this to c/vendorvetting because the people who need it are not reading this community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/line_petrov36 points·1 months ago

BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this

replysharereportpermalink
u/gas_fee_grump9 points·1 months ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mariam_cabrera17 points·1 months ago

Came off after 16 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

replysharereportpermalink
u/search_before_post5 points·1 months ago

Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ayesha_erdoganOP3 points·1 months ago

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

replysharereportpermalink
u/ayesha_erdoganOP2 points·1 months ago

Came off after 33 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elin_varga11 points·1 months ago

This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tired_ledger_ftw9 points·1 months ago

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ilias_kaufmann6 points·1 months ago

Mechanistically the bit that matters is regulatory. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sequence_checkerMOD4 points·1 months ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_ilunga1 point·1 months ago

Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ruben_cabrera5 points·1 months ago

sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence

replysharereportpermalink
u/rekha_mwangi1 point·1 months ago

Did anything else change in the same window?

replysharereportpermalink
u/source_or_silence6 points·1 months ago

rodent data must be labelled as rodent data

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.