GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] SSA BPC — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% — 20 comments in the full submission. View in context.
364
c/bpc157·submitted 1 months ago by u/ayesha_erdogan

[Lab] SSA BPC — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2%

Labbranch of 4 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking BPC-157 against eGFR for 19 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay,…

Read the full submission and all 20 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 1 months ago
u/mariam_cabrera17 points·1 months ago

Came off after 16 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

replysharereportpermalink
u/search_before_post5 points·1 months ago

Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ayesha_erdoganOP3 points·1 months ago

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

replysharereportpermalink
u/ayesha_erdoganOP2 points·1 months ago

Came off after 33 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.