three years of regulatory threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: tendon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 17 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 11 people measuring the same…
What was the batch number and which service?
the rodent data rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data