GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
2.2k
c/bpc157·posted 6 months ago by u/ismael_chukwu

three years of regulatory threads, summarised so you do not have to read them

Lab Well Actually ×6 Clean Column ×1

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.

The claim: tendon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 17 months without either producing anything.

What would actually settle it is 11 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.

If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.

2,444 up / 249 down91% upvoted30 commentsid 103tly22 Jan 2026

30 comments

19 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/ms_fragmenter380 points·6 months ago·edited

Week 95 for me and the honest summary is: 34kg down, reflux manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meal_prep_mira171 points·6 months ago

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/bpc_scepticMOD251 points·6 months ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]180 points·6 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_chukwuOP131 points·6 months ago

[removed by moderator]

Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_chukwuOP99 points·6 months ago

the sequence variation is the real issue

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_falk0 points·6 months ago

the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_kimani210 points·6 months ago

Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mariam_mensa264 points·6 months ago

BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (4) →
u/rui_only_ro144 points·6 months ago

pentadecapeptide is BPC-157, the supply chain naming is a mess

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_chukwuOP64 points·6 months ago

regulatory status changed in 8 countries, check yours

replysharereportpermalink
u/search_before_post0 points·6 months ago

What was the batch number and which service?

replysharereportpermalink
u/clara_danquah1 point·6 months ago

the rodent data rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not

replysharereportpermalink
u/adaeze_krastev1 point·6 months ago·edited

rodent data must be labelled as rodent data

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_falk1 point·6 months ago

Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/bpc157
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/bpc_scepticu/sequence_checkeru/rui_only_ro
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →