[Results] 52 weeks, 35kg, and bloodwork was the hard part
Right, the ApoB question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 13 data points over 36 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 33, not week 82. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
nobody here can tell you what a result means for you
baseline is the most important eGFR measurement, you cannot collect it later
baseline is the most important eGFR measurement, you cannot collect it later
Adding to this: ALT is doing more work than the comment implies.
A1c moves slowly, quarterly is plenty
nobody here can tell you what a result means for you
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
A1c moves slowly, quarterly is plenty
Strongly agree. ALT is where you catch the liver story early.
eGFR noise during rapid loss is expected
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
Strongly agree. ALT is where you catch the liver story early.
Strongly agree. ALT is where you catch the liver story early.
- 1The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…6 comments in this branch · started by u/emil_agyeman
- 2nobody here can tell you what a result means for you5 comments in this branch · started by u/micro_bump_mick