Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 2.4mg, week 86, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable —…
u/two_mil_or_one
Reconstitution volume is a concentration choice, not a dose choice.
member · joined 30 Aug 2024
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/researchpeptides · 52 points · 11 months ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in France.
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/researchpeptides · 6 points · 11 months ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/researchpeptides · 7 points · 11 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on week 11 check-in — 31kg down, muscle cramps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 46 points · 11 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on stalled for 9 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/semaglutide · 75 points · 11 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on anyone else notice SURMOUNT kicking in around week 20 in c/tirzepatide · 237 points · 11 months ago
Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.
comment on does purity actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/hplc · 15 points · 11 months ago
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own
comment on GIP: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/tirzepatide · 1 points · 11 months ago
nope, the equivalence to semaglutide is not known, comparing 15mg tirz to 2.4mg sema is guessing
comment on help me understand plateau, I have read the wiki twice in c/semaglutide · 19 points · 1 year ago
my fasting insulin moved before the scale did and i nearly missed it
comment on [Discussion] the research peptides advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/researchpeptides · 5 points · 1 year ago
the thymosin literature is thin on humans
comment on week 96 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/hplc · 75 points · 1 year ago
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether phase 2 is why in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on what changed for me between week 10 and week 53 in c/semaglutide · 219 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on Germany: SURMOUNT, and what it actually costs here in c/tirzepatide · 318 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, dual agonism does produce a different appetite profile than GLP-1 alone.
comment on [Vendor] KP vs BCH on the same compound, same month, one test each in c/semaglutide · 612 points · 1 year ago
comment on unpopular opinion: integration is massively overrated in c/hplc · 112 points · 1 year ago
related substances are where the story lives, not the main peak
comment on unpopular opinion: integration is massively overrated in c/hplc · 69 points · 1 year ago
What was the column and what gradient?
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on purity in this community changed substantially around the start of last year,…
comment on Spain: gradient, and what it actually costs here in c/hplc · 197 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.