2.8k
[Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 13 years out of date
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking test results against triglycerides for 35 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation…
u/thandi_solberg
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Groningen.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
9,296post karma
3,582comment karma
4submissions
45comments
Overview — page 3 of 3
comment on [Meta] the below spec rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/labresults · 47 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 13 years out of date in c/labresults · 100 points · 2 years ago
the 98.1% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 13 years out of date in c/labresults · 269 points · 2 years ago
Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?
comment on three years of pentadecapeptide threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/bpc157 · 25 points · 2 years ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on why does nobody talk about batch in c/labresults · 13 points · 2 years ago
You have restated the marketing copy.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 34 weeks to accept.
comment on test results vs Janoshik — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 366 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
comment on [Question] Janoshik — what am I missing here in c/labresults · 5 points · 2 years ago
sample of one, say so
comment on [Vendor] QST order #9 — Canada, 17 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/labresults · 91 points · 2 years ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result