u/scam_taxonomy

still evidence-based: what went wrong, when, proof

Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 50 weeks to accept.

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

the GL Biochem situation resolved, logged it here as resolved

Tested 8 batches from TFC over 20 weeks. The consistency is the signal. They claim 98, they deliver 98.

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop

QST took 22 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

Maintenance for 24 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.

the small molecule is whether this actually works long-term

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was WWB.

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.