u/scam_taxonomy

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

The TFC exit scam collected 15 orders and disappeared. Order ids 3 through 15 all silent.

testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 2–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.

evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

the reship rate on HJ is actually pretty consistent

FGP took 17 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

What was the batch number and which service?

Adding to this: stopped is doing more work than the comment implies.

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

Not to be pedantic but exit scam and cloned site are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

still evidence-based: what went wrong, when, proof

Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Germany.