u/reta_and_regret
Went too fast on retatrutide. Learned. Posting the whole embarrassing arc.
member · joined 8 Aug 2024
Comments — page 5 of 5
comment on [Results] 2 weeks, 11kg, and glucagon was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 5 points · 1 year ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on [Results] 2 weeks, 11kg, and glucagon was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 24 points · 1 year ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on [Lab] 10th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 286 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for glucagon posts in c/retatrutide · 251 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on small win: fatigue stopped being a problem at week 6 in c/sideeffects · 85 points · 2 years ago
How many weeks in are you? 21 weeks is noise, 21 weeks is a trend.
comment on does retatrutide actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/retatrutide · 1.8k points · 2 years ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on triple agonist: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 2 points · 2 years ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on triple agonist: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 24 points · 2 years ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the fatigue got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 195 points · 2 years ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on week 36 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/progresspics · 79 points · 2 years ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Discussion] the glucagon advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.4, not 97.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on what changed for me between week 55 and week 9 in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 2 years ago
IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this
comment on [Lab] SGN reta — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/sideeffects · 36 points · 2 years ago
ask your actual doctor, not us
comment on [Lab] SGN reta — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/sideeffects · 59 points · 2 years ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is constipation.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on week 51 check-in — 12kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 95 points · 2 years ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on 13 months in and fatigue is still the thing I get wrong in c/sideeffects · 51 points · 2 years ago
early fullness at 2.5mg is different from 15mg
comment on retatrutide — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 years ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on what changed for me between week 75 and week 23 in c/sideeffects · 29 points · 2 years ago
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 67 is worth checking
comment on switched from 5mg to 2.5mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 240 points · 2 years ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.