[Lab] SGN reta — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6%
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking hair loss against triglycerides for 3 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, the sulphur burps hit on day 18 for me too, not day 1.
Strongly agree. Describe your dose, your week number, and your titration speed or nobody can help.
Same experience. Week 54 and it simply stopped. I know that is not useful information but it is what happened.
week 60 and the the food-noise thing is finally getting better
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 17 is worth checking
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
hair loss is real and usually reversible when you stabilize
Mechanistically the bit that matters is sulphur burps. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
Strongly agree. Describe your dose, your week number, and your titration speed or nobody can help.
The fatigue passes. I kept a log and the timeline was the only useful thing. 21 weeks and it was basically gone.
severe abdominal pain is an urgent-care question, not a forum question
severe abdominal pain is an urgent-care question, not a forum question
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Same experience. Week 85 and it simply stopped. I know that is not useful information but it is what happened.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is constipation. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is constipation.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Yeah, the reflux hit on day 15 for me too, not day 1.
constipation is real, boring, and fixable
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
ask your actual doctor, not us
ask your actual doctor, not us
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 83 weeks to accept.
resting heart rate moved up 23 bpm and settled back down when I stopped escalating
sulphur burps are disgusting but not dangerous, 16 weeks and they stopped
IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this
IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this
Adding to this: constipation is doing more work than the comment implies.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is constipation. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
- 1constipation is real, boring, and fixable10 comments in this branch · started by u/insulin_syringe_ian
- 2Mechanistically the bit that matters is sulphur burps. It explains most of…6 comments in this branch · started by u/quiet_moderator