Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: MASH matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have…
u/old_account_2023
Been here since the first week. It was 40 people and a wiki stub.
long-standing contributor · joined 11 Aug 2023
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on the normal thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/newbiequestions · 53 points · 9 months ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail.
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Lab] SGN survo — VendorInvestigate came back 99.0% against a claimed 99.1% in c/survodutide · 143 points · 9 months ago
This is correct. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
comment on what is is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1uk in c/newbiequestions · 54 points · 9 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on goal weight — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 23 points · 10 months ago
How long at maintenance?
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on rules in c/meta · 44 points · 10 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about basics until somebody posts a number in c/newbiequestions · 47 points · 11 months ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on reading identity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/researchpeptides · 17 points · 1 year ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 43 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 62 points · 1 year ago
purity and identity are two questions
comment on [Meta] the identity rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 1 year ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not administration
comment on [Lab] 12th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/newbiequestions · 161 points · 1 year ago
the beginner question is not dumb
comment on France: survodutide, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · -30 points · 1 year ago
hepatic fat and survodutide are the story
comment on small win: goal weight stopped being a problem at week 20 in c/maintenancephase · 104 points · 1 year ago
the plateau is where the learning happens
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about thymosin until somebody posts a number in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 1 year ago
focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state
comment on why does nobody talk about secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 468 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on 10 months in and week one is still the thing I get wrong in c/newbiequestions · 1 points · 1 year ago
what is titration — it means going slow on the escalation
comment on genuine question about glucagon that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/survodutide · 24 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
Adding to this: hepatic fat is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for long term posts in c/maintenancephase · 26 points · 2 years ago
food noise returns but not always immediately
comment on basics — my 24-week log, condensed into one table in c/newbiequestions · 10 points · 2 years ago
Are you on a pen or vial?