the MASH question that gets asked weekly, answered properly
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: MASH matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 10 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 7 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
phase 13 data is interesting, phase 5 will be different
MASH claims need the trial and the biopsy endpoint
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
rodent survodutide is investigation only
not approved, descriptive posts only
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
Strongly agree. The safety story is separate.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
- 1The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after…4 comments in this branch · started by u/jarno_adeyemi
- 2Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do…4 comments in this branch · started by u/camila_trevino