GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of the MASH question that gets asked weekly, answered properly — 12 comments in the full submission. View in context.
-61
c/survodutide·submitted 8 months ago by u/old_account_2023

the MASH question that gets asked weekly, answered properly

Paperbranch of 4 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: MASH matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 10 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 7 people measuring the same thing…

Read the full submission and all 12 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 8 months ago
u/camila_trevino11 points·8 months ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_bakker9 points·8 months ago·edited

rodent survodutide is investigation only

replysharereportpermalink
u/renzo_asante5 points·8 months ago

not approved, descriptive posts only

replysharereportpermalink
u/slow_logbook_notes302 points·8 months ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/survodutide

Survodutide-specific discussion: glucagon-receptor co-agonism, the hepatic fat and MASH resolution data, and how the side-effect profile compares with GIP-based dual agonism. Small community, high signal.

12kmembers
62submissions
Feb 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/survodutide rules
  1. Glucagon co-agonism has a distinct safety story. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
  2. MASH claims need the trial and the biopsy endpoint.
  3. Not approved. Descriptive posts only.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.