u/nikhil_teixeira
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Aalborg.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
Comments — page 3 of 4
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify food noise in c/semaglutide · 0 points · 1 year ago
okay but what dose of sema are you on
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on three years of fake COA threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 7 points · 1 year ago
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
comment on tried USDC for 5 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cryptopay · 35 points · 1 year ago
never post a wallet address, not yours, not a vendor's
comment on three years of fake COA threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 38 points · 1 year ago
Did QYB respond or ghost you?
comment on [Vendor] QST order #12 — Denmark, 15 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/semaglutide · 9 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on food noise: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/semaglutide · 31 points · 1 year ago
week 93 and i am still not at maintenance, do not rush the ladder
comment on 23 months in and gas fees is still the thing I get wrong in c/cryptopay · 0 points · 1 year ago
USDC exists on 19 networks, vendor credits are network-specific
comment on my eGFR moved and I cannot work out whether plateau is why in c/semaglutide · 74 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The slow route gets the outcome, the fast route gets you the side effects.
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 1.0mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/semaglutide · 266 points · 1 year ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about crypto in c/cryptopay · 7 points · 1 year ago
USDC exists on 11 networks, vendor credits are network-specific
comment on help me understand fraud, I have read the wiki twice in c/scamalerts · 3 points · 1 year ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on three years of exit scam threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 2 years ago
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 85 in c/cryptopay · 20 points · 2 years ago
Which network and did the vendor confirm they credit it?
comment on plateau vs titration — genuinely asking which matters more in c/semaglutide · 51 points · 2 years ago
stalled at 1.7mg, went up, and regretted it, the stall would have broken anyway
comment on switched from 2.4mg to 1.7mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/semaglutide · 88 points · 2 years ago
titration speed is Ozempic plus side effects, period
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Lab] SSA sema — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/semaglutide · 32 points · 2 years ago
Cosigning. The slow route gets the outcome, the fast route gets you the side effects.
comment on [Lab] SSA sema — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/semaglutide · 22 points · 2 years ago
pens are overpriced, research vials are research grade, same molecule different price
comment on [Lab] SSA sema — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/semaglutide · 29 points · 2 years ago
titration speed is Ozempic plus side effects, period
comment on [Lab] SSA sema — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/semaglutide · 9 points · 2 years ago
the quiet is real. the food noise just stops.
comment on anyone else notice fraud kicking in around week 75 in c/scamalerts · 106 points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 99.0. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.