GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
NI

u/niels_roos

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Basel.

member · joined 11 Feb 2025

6,696post karma
4,450comment karma
8submissions
94comments

Comments — page 5 of 5

comment on help me understand 503B, I have read the wiki twice in c/compounding · 97 points · 1 year ago

Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.

permalink

comment on [Discussion] the receptor advice in here is 4 years out of date in c/glp1science · 85 points · 1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

permalink

comment on [Meta] the 503B rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/compounding · 1 points · 1 year ago

state board rules differ, say which state

permalink

comment on [Meta] the 503B rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/compounding · -1 points · 1 year ago

Asked 6 compounders about API source. One told me, one dodged, one said they cannot say. The answer is the signal.

permalink

comment on small win: dead space stopped being a problem at week 95 in c/reconstitution · 23 points · 1 year ago

the concentration on the vial in marker is the most important step

permalink

comment on what changed for me between week 95 and week 43 in c/glp1science · 110 points · 2 years ago

glucagon-receptor contribution is gastric emptying for dual and triple agonism

permalink

comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the muscle cramps got better, not worse in c/glp1science · 24 points · 2 years ago

receptor distribution matters, GLP-1 is not everywhere

permalink

comment on reading state board threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/compounding · 9 points · 2 years ago

state board rules differ, say which state

permalink

comment on [Meta] the units rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 2 years ago

Did you write the concentration on the vial?

permalink

comment on genuine question about receptor that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1science · 178 points · 2 years ago

Is that mechanism or speculation?

permalink

comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about appetite until somebody posts a number in c/glp1science · 94 points · 2 years ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

permalink

comment on [Question] incretin — what am I missing here in c/glp1science · 109 points · 2 years ago

the half-life is incretin, affects steady state timing

permalink

comment on [Lab] SSA survo — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/compounding · 1 points · 2 years ago

the Poland situation is different from the US, different regulations

permalink

comment on the bacteriostatic water question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/reconstitution · 6 points · 2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 98.1, not 98.0. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

permalink

Trophy case

No trophies yet. Most accounts here never get one.

Cake day 11 Feb 2025
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.