3.3k
tried PeptideMeter for 23 weeks. here is what happened.
Quick one. Canada here. Medutest works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice…
u/milos_trevino
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rosario.
member · joined 14 May 2025
16,715post karma
5,729comment karma
8submissions
104comments
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on why does nobody talk about certificate of analysis in c/coa · 16 points · 11 months ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on why does nobody talk about certificate of analysis in c/coa · 1 points · 11 months ago
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 23 weeks to accept.
comment on why does nobody talk about SELECT in c/trialwatch · 18 points · 11 months ago
This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.
comment on [PSA] chargeback is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/cryptopay · 60 points · 11 months ago
memo/tag requirements differ by network
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify area percent in c/coa · 248 points · 11 months ago
Did they give you the chromatogram or just the summary line?
comment on stalled for 18 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/labresults · 18 points · 1 year ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on tried PeptideMeter for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 14 points · 1 year ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on tried PeptideMeter for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 214 points · 1 year ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/coa · 75 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on stalled for 12 weeks at 10mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · -5 points · 1 year ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on three years of certificate of analysis threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 160 points · 1 year ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on three years of certificate of analysis threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 227 points · 1 year ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on three years of certificate of analysis threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 203 points · 1 year ago
The COA I was holding said 96.8% area and I thought it was trash. Turns out the method was solid and the impurity profile was clean.
4.4k
three years of certificate of analysis threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Right, the purity question again, but with numbers this time. I have 24 data points over 10 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance,…
comment on related substances is the most under-discussed thing in c/scamalerts in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on related substances is the most under-discussed thing in c/scamalerts in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on three years of SELECT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on switched from 1.7mg to 1.0mg and the fatigue got better, not worse in c/coa · 41 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about area percent in c/coa · 60 points · 1 year ago
Asked FGP for the batch-specific COA and they sent it within six hours, full document, batch number, date, everything. That is the baseline.