u/line_petrov
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Hyderabad.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on am I the only one who found formulary harder than the injections in c/insurancefights · 4 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.
comment on anyone else notice SURMOUNT kicking in around week 30 in c/tirzepatide · 126 points · 1 year ago
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 97.9% body weight at 4 weeks.
comment on am I the only one who found formulary harder than the injections in c/insurancefights · 26 points · 1 year ago
External review overturned the denial. Took 9 weeks but the process exists.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about rodent data in c/bpc157 · 5 points · 1 year ago
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [PSA] heart rate is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/sideeffects · 21 points · 1 year ago
IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this
comment on [Results] 57 weeks, 15kg, and BPC-157 was the hard part in c/bpc157 · 8 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on what changed for me between week 40 and week 83 in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on pentadecapeptide — 10 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/bpc157 · 46 points · 1 year ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on dual agonist: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/tirzepatide · 13 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Tirz is better than sema is not a claim without a comparator dose.
comment on dual agonist: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/tirzepatide · 3 points · 1 year ago
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
comment on someone explain tirzepatide to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/tirzepatide · -2 points · 1 year ago
dual agonism is dual agonist, do not generalise from semaglutide
comment on BPC-157 — my 4-week log, condensed into one table in c/bpc157 · 19 points · 1 year ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on 14 months in and formulary is still the thing I get wrong in c/insurancefights · 13 points · 1 year ago
External review overturned the denial. Took 7 weeks but the process exists.
comment on why does nobody talk about regulatory in c/bpc157 · 50 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
comment on heart rate: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/sideeffects · 527 points · 2 years ago
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on denial in c/insurancefights · 15 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for hair loss posts in c/sideeffects · 37 points · 2 years ago
Not to be pedantic but reflux and hair loss are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on three years of Mounjaro threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/tirzepatide · 32 points · 2 years ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on switched from 10mg to 0.25mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/insurancefights · 78 points · 2 years ago
Small correction: the trial was 22 weeks, not 34. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on what changed for me between week 55 and week 9 in c/sideeffects · 47 points · 2 years ago
constipation is real, boring, and fixable