[Results] 57 weeks, 15kg, and BPC-157 was the hard part
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 12 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
[removed by moderator]
near-zero controlled human data, full stop
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 24 weeks to accept.
BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this
the sequence variation is the real issue
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
Not convinced.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 37 weeks to accept.
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 46 weeks to accept.
the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
near-zero controlled human data, full stop
BPC rodent data is a naming problem, three things are called this
- 1Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual…11 comments in this branch · started by u/rekha_mwangi
- 2You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.8 comments in this branch · started by u/nurse_ish_2025