[Results] 57 weeks, 15kg, and BPC-157 was the hard part
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 12 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true…
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
[removed by moderator]
near-zero controlled human data, full stop
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 24 weeks to accept.
BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this
the sequence variation is the real issue