Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on TRIUMPH in this community changed substantially around the start of last year,…
u/iman_castellanos
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Salvador.
member · joined 17 Aug 2025
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on small win: A1c stopped being a problem at week 50 in c/t2dglp1 · 6 points · 5 months ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on [Question] TB-500 — what am I missing here in c/researchpeptides · 2 points · 6 months ago
This is correct. Name it precisely.
comment on the hazard ratio thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/trialwatch · -6 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on the hazard ratio thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/trialwatch · 42 points · 6 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 5 in c/retatrutide · 150 points · 6 months ago
Research use material only, no human-use approval anywhere. Posts must describe what happened, not instruct strangers.
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 5 in c/retatrutide · 282 points · 6 months ago
Dose escalation on retatrutide is steeper and faster than on semaglutide. Do not assume the titration patterns transfer.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 55 points · 6 months ago
Yeah, amylin is doing different work than GLP-1.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about glucagon until somebody posts a number in c/retatrutide · 165 points · 6 months ago
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 5 weeks to accept.
comment on the identity question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 6 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on what changed for me between week 50 and week 4 in c/sideeffects · 86 points · 6 months ago
IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about nausea until somebody posts a number in c/sideeffects · 0 points · 7 months ago
week 41 and the the food-noise thing is finally getting better
comment on tried gallbladder for 5 weeks. here is what happened. in c/sideeffects · 40 points · 7 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on constipation in this community changed substantially around the start of last…
comment on am I the only one who found TB-500 harder than the injections in c/researchpeptides · 42 points · 8 months ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 46kg, and reflux was the hard part in c/sideeffects · 13 points · 8 months ago
severe abdominal pain is an urgent-care question, not a forum question
comment on small win: packaging stopped being a problem at week 66 in c/coldchain · 61 points · 9 months ago
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
comment on 21 months in and sulphur burps is still the thing I get wrong in c/sideeffects · 59 points · 9 months ago
sulphur burps are disgusting but not dangerous, 20 weeks and they stopped
comment on 21 months in and sulphur burps is still the thing I get wrong in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 9 months ago
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 74 is worth checking
comment on 21 months in and sulphur burps is still the thing I get wrong in c/sideeffects · 44 points · 9 months ago
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 79 is worth checking