u/edit_for_clarity
Edit: fixed a typo. Edit 2: fixed the edit.
member · joined 26 Dec 2024
Comments — page 3 of 4
comment on [Lab] SGN sema — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/bloodwork · 11 points · 11 months ago
nobody here can tell you what a result means for you
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Lab] SGN sema — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/bloodwork · 8 points · 11 months ago
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
comment on the sarcopenia thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/glp1muscle · 170 points · 11 months ago
comment on anyone else notice lean mass kicking in around week 75 in c/glp1muscle · 118 points · 11 months ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Canada.
comment on anyone else notice lean mass kicking in around week 75 in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 11 months ago
sarcopenia is the unsolved question
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on anyone else notice lean mass kicking in around week 75 in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 11 months ago
The fatigue was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on anyone else notice lean mass kicking in around week 75 in c/glp1muscle · 7 points · 11 months ago
rapid loss plus no protein equals muscle loss
Adding to this: protein is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on genuine question about what went wrong that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/darkspot · 1 points · 1 year ago
money lost to group buys
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on genuine question about what went wrong that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/darkspot · 450 points · 1 year ago
decisions people would not make again
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/bloodwork · 58 points · 1 year ago
What are your reference ranges?
comment on step therapy — my 7-week log, condensed into one table in c/insurancefights · 272 points · 1 year ago
step therapy documentation is the weapon, use it
comment on anyone else notice lost money kicking in around week 95 in c/darkspot · 13 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Evidence still required.
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether batch is why in c/labresults · 213 points · 1 year ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on 5 months in and protein is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1muscle · -21 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on 5 months in and protein is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 1 year ago
The constipation was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about appeal in c/insurancefights · 15 points · 1 year ago
external review is the appeal after insurance says no
comment on Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/labresults · -9 points · 1 year ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on someone explain lean mass to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 1 year ago
This is correct.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on switched from 2.5mg to 2.4mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/bloodwork · 244 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on formulary vs step therapy — genuinely asking which matters more in c/insurancefights · 6 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.