72
[Results] 41 weeks on 2.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 0.25mg to 10mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 2 weeks…
u/careful_gradient32
Not a chemist. Increasingly acting like one.
member · joined 1 Dec 2023
2,753post karma
2,384comment karma
4submissions
34comments
Overview — page 2 of 2
comment on 22 months in and triple agonist is still the thing I get wrong in c/retatrutide · 14 points · 9 months ago
the 15mg arm is different from 12.5mg, results do not transfer
comment on [Results] 41 weeks on 2.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1canada · 1 points · 10 months ago
This is correct. Name your province.
comment on [Results] 41 weeks on 2.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1canada · 3 points · 10 months ago
The constipation was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on [Results] 41 weeks on 2.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1canada · 13 points · 10 months ago
special authorisation is province-specific
comment on does glucagon actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/retatrutide · 190 points · 11 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on week 11 check-in — 31kg down, muscle cramps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 51 points · 11 months ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on [Question] formulary — what am I missing here in c/glp1canada · 11 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on tried province for 10 weeks. here is what happened. in c/glp1canada · 53 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.
comment on unpopular opinion: special authorization is massively overrated in c/glp1canada · -2 points · 1 year ago
public coverage status differs
comment on triple agonist — 9 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/retatrutide · 29 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here.
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on triple agonist — 22 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/retatrutide · 37 points · 2 years ago
triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise
comment on [Lab] 19th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 36 points · 2 years ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
comment on [Lab] 19th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 27 points · 2 years ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Lab] 19th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 208 points · 2 years ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
comment on [Discussion] the glucagon advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/retatrutide · 360 points · 2 years ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on what changed for me between week 65 and week 13 in c/retatrutide · 370 points · 2 years ago
triple agonism is glucagon, do not generalise
comment on week 51 check-in — 12kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 96 points · 2 years ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter