GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
BU

u/burned_once_twice

Lost $340 to a group buy in 2024. Now insufferable about escrow.

member · joined 5 Dec 2024

20,308post karma
8,335comment karma
12submissions
93comments

Comments — page 5 of 5

comment on tried A1c for 22 weeks. here is what happened. in c/bloodwork · 800 points · 1 year ago

Ferritin tanked from 14 to 30. Small appetite, reduced iron intake, nobody was testing it until I asked.

permalink

comment on what would you tell week-1 you about regret in c/darkspot · 275 points · 1 year ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

permalink

comment on the baseline labs thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/bloodwork · 9 points · 1 year ago

ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy

permalink

comment on my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether ferritin is why in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 2 years ago

Yeah, baseline matters more than any later number.

permalink

comment on anyone else notice phase 2 kicking in around week 19 in c/retatrutide · 30 points · 2 years ago

The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.

permalink

comment on [Lab] 19th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · -30 points · 2 years ago

Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.

permalink

comment on [Discussion] the glucagon advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/retatrutide · 29 points · 2 years ago

research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols

permalink

comment on [Lab] SGN survo — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/compounding · 1 points · 2 years ago

Small correction: the trial was 15 weeks, not 37. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

permalink

comment on [Lab] SGN survo — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/compounding · 742 points · 2 years ago

this deserves more than 17 upvotes

permalink

comment on week 46 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 223 points · 2 years ago

TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 98.6% weight loss but the early fullness profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.

permalink

comment on week 46 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 181 points · 2 years ago

Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.

permalink

comment on week 46 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 384 points · 2 years ago

triple agonism is dose escalation, do not generalise

permalink

comment on retatrutide — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/retatrutide · 23 points · 2 years ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

permalink

Trophy case
Top Contributor Answered the Question
Cake day 5 Dec 2024
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.