u/anya_moreau

pricing posts need date and currency

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 86 weeks to accept.

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

the Spain answer is not the Spain answer

apotheke, receta, pharmacy — twenty-seven different answers

research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.3. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder

tag your country in the title, bare EU gets a template

EMA notices are different from national ones

Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.

This is correct. Tag your country.

the dosing is steep, the injection-site soreness reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet

EU rules is usually a national question wearing a hat

Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.

This is correct. Name it precisely.

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

post the whole document, not the headline number

Adding to this: purity is doing more work than the comment implies.

regulatory status varies by country, check yours

Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.

I am going to push back on this slightly.