[Question] how do you actually verify glucagon
Quick one. Canada here.
MASH works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 24 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
the safety profile is not just tirzepatide amplified
hepatic fat and survodutide are the story
Strongly agree. The safety story is separate.
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
glucagon co-agonism has a different safety story
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
This is correct. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
the MASH indication changes the risk calculus
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 66 weeks to accept.
the MASH indication changes the risk calculus
The fatigue was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
[deleted]
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
the GLP-1/glucagon dual is hepatic fat, different from GIP/GLP-1
- 1Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.9 comments in this branch · started by u/dexa_twice_yearly
- 2the MASH indication changes the risk calculus8 comments in this branch · started by u/zeynep_ndiaye