[Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on secretagogue
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 1.7mg, week 19, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — secretagogue — and tracked it for 19 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So…
the thymosin literature is thin on humans
Stalled for 10 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 15.
Stalled for 10 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 15.
Adding to this: handling is doing more work than the comment implies.
Stalled for 10 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 15.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 33 weeks to accept.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
the research peptides literature is thin on humans
Yeah, identity is the first question.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
Slight fix: the number was 98.0, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
the 5-letter analogs are speculative
regulatory status varies by country, check yours