France: mg/mL, and what it actually costs here
Right, the units question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 5 data points over 30 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 34, not week 83. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
Show the arithmetic. Where did the units come from?
This is correct. 1mL versus 7mL is the common mistake.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
the concentration on the vial in marker is the most important step
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
20mg vial, 2mL water, concentration is 20/2 — write it on the vial afterwards
Are you using a u-100 or u-40 syringe? That changes everything.
stopper coring on the 13th draw because you keep using the same entry point. rotate.
bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
- 1I am going to push back on this slightly.8 comments in this branch · started by u/sigrid_kaufmann