GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1.2k
c/reconstitution·posted 2 years ago by u/elin_ferrari

why does nobody talk about reconstitution

PSA Well Actually ×8 Long Haul ×3

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.

The claim: mg/mL matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 9 months without either producing anything.

What would actually settle it is 13 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.

If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.

1,664 up / 511 down77% upvoted39 commentsid 1jjnjf11 Nov 2023

39 comments

26 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution160 points·2 years ago
i have this exact spreadsheet
replysharereportpermalink
u/rosa_mensah101 points·2 years ago

Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tl_dr_tina81 points·2 years ago·edited

Cosigning.

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ilias_steiner52 points·2 years ago·edited

bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way

replysharereportpermalink
u/units_not_mgMOD160 points·2 years ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/clara_weiss71 points·2 years ago·edited

bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way

replysharereportpermalink
u/elin_ferrariOP87 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 99.0, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_kimani87 points·2 years ago

Removed a chain here.

Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_erdogan-6 points·2 years ago

show your working or it is unhelpful

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/arne_restrepo84 points·2 years ago
genuinely useful, thanks
replysharereportpermalink
u/tl_dr_tina56 points·2 years ago

bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way

replysharereportpermalink
u/aurel_boateng52 points·2 years ago
yep. 74 weeks in, same.
replysharereportpermalink
u/yusuf_achebe36 points·2 years ago

What was the vial size and how much bac water?

replysharereportpermalink
u/elin_ferrariOP34 points·2 years ago

Two vials, two different concentrations, forgot which was which, almost made a 4 times error. Now I label everything.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bruno_dumitru10 points·2 years ago·edited

i am begging people to write down the concentration

replysharereportpermalink
u/reflux_report8 points·2 years ago·edited

Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elin_ferrariOP4 points·2 years ago

i am begging people to write down the concentration

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]6 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/marisol_frisk54 points·2 years ago

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_weiss20 points·2 years ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution15 points·2 years ago

never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration

replysharereportpermalink
u/rosa_mensah12 points·2 years ago

more water means more units for the same dose, which means finer resolution

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_kirchner7 points·2 years ago

swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation

replysharereportpermalink
u/iman_falk33 points·2 years ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/saskia_mwangi23 points·2 years ago

stopper coring on the 8th draw because you keep using the same entry point. rotate.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/reconstitution

The arithmetic and the technique. Bacteriostatic versus sterile water, reconstitution volume as a concentration choice, converting mg/mL into insulin-syringe units, dead space, swirl-not-shake, stopper coring, and how long a reconstituted vial is actually good for. Math errors get corrected fast and politely.

88kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/reconstitution rules
  1. Show your numbers. "How many units?" with no mg and no mL cannot be answered.
  2. Never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration it assumes.
  3. No sterile-compounding-for-others discussion. Personal handling only.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.