is it normal to get nausea at week 19
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on insulin syringe in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Mechanistically the bit that matters is reconstitution. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
Is that 15mg vial or 16mg?
dead space is real and the syringe matters
stopper coring on the 23th draw because you keep using the same entry point. rotate.
Spent 5 weeks confused about concentration math until someone showed me the table. 20mg, 2mL, concentration is 20/2.
[removed by moderator]
Small correction: the trial was 11 weeks, not 3. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
- 1The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…8 comments in this branch · started by u/aleksi_lehtinen