Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of 20 months in and non-peptide is still the thing I get wrong — 51 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.8k
20 months in and non-peptide is still the thing I get wrong
ACHIEVE. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/bpc157 is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort ACHIEVE out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 8 months. My A1c was…
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
availability speculation must be flaired Speculation
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
the early fullness profile is speculative at this stage
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
the supply conversation changes if this approves