why does nobody talk about PeptideMeter
Right, the Medutest question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 4 data points over 8 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 31, not week 80. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
inter-lab variance is real, 16 points is inside normal
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.
[deleted]
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 24 points, both inside inter-lab variance
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
multiple batches from CPC show a spread, that is the data
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with Medutest, not with what you concluded.
Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
Mechanistically the bit that matters is Janoshik. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
Small correction: the trial was 19 weeks, not 12. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 13 points, both inside inter-lab variance
TFC product, Janoshik test, 96.2% result, batch 2, 37 days in transit. Logged.
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
- 1Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is…13 comments in this branch · started by u/britta_boateng
- 2inter-lab variance is real, 16 points is inside normal5 comments in this branch · started by u/clara_weiss