[Discussion] we are measuring PeptideMeter at the wrong time and calling it noise
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/semaglutide repeats that Medutest is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 15 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
[deleted]
sample of one, say so
the Janoshik and VendorInvestigate results differ by 22 points, both inside inter-lab variance
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
sample of one, say so
ERP product, Janoshik test, 99.1% result, batch 8, 24 days in transit. Logged.
My VendorInvestigate result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. MKM deserves that note in the directory.
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
Batch number? Date of test?
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
- 1This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please…8 comments in this branch · started by u/peptidemeter_pat