switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the the food-noise thing got better, not worse
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking test results against eGFR for 15 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one…
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
The Janoshik result at 96.8% was below the 96.2% claim. GGPeps retested at their cost and came back 96.8%. Logged as resolved.
inter-lab variance is real, 3 points is inside normal
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
MKM / BPC / batch 20 / PeptideMeter / 97.6% — that is the shape
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
[deleted]
GGPeps claimed 94.2%, Janoshik came back 96.2%. 2 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
GGPeps claimed 94.2%, Janoshik came back 96.2%.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 54 weeks to accept.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
sample of one, say so
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.