GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of what changed for me between week 95 and week 49 — 55 comments in the full submission. View in context.
863
c/labresults·submitted 1 year ago by u/neha_rahimi

what changed for me between week 95 and week 49

Medutestbranch of 5 comments

Been lurking in c/bloodwork for about 14 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 16, 2.5mg, and test results is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 25 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to…

Read the full submission and all 55 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 1 year ago
u/janoshik_junkieMOD118 points·1 year ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nayeli_iyer27 points·1 year ago

Was that the vendor COA or your own test?

replysharereportpermalink
u/britta_boateng38 points·1 year ago·edited

QYB / BPC / batch 13 / VendorInvestigate / 98.1% — that is the shape

replysharereportpermalink
u/lift_heavy_thingsresistance training22 points·1 year ago

Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.