[Discussion] the DHL advice in here is 12 years out of date
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 1.7mg, week 40, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — lane — and tracked it for 14 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, actual transit days
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Homopeptide Denmark to Denmark: 8 days with Homopeptide shipping, 6 days with customs. No drama.
Customs held the package for 13 days. No problems, just time. Factor it into expectations.
Canada to Canada: MKM with 4 days is the average, variance is 21
origin to destination, carrier, transit variance
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
origin to destination, carrier, transit variance
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
- 1no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal6 comments in this branch · started by u/mod_cold_room
- 2lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, actual transit days4 comments in this branch · started by u/kenji_kimani