GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of someone explain stopped to me like I have not read a paper in years — 24 comments in the full submission. View in context.
535
c/darkspot·submitted 9 months ago by u/ewan_tulloch

someone explain stopped to me like I have not read a paper in years

Questionbranch of 6 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking failure against triglycerides for 23 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab,…

Read the full submission and all 24 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 9 months ago
u/refund_ledger45 points·9 months ago

heavily moderated for cruelty, not pessimism

replysharereportpermalink
u/endpoint_creep23 points·9 months ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivypharmacology24 points·9 months ago

heavily moderated for cruelty, not pessimism

Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.8% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rohan_krastev9 points·9 months ago

the 9 order that disappeared from SSA

replysharereportpermalink
u/mei_cardoso8 points·9 months ago·edited

heavily moderated for cruelty, not pessimism Disagree on that part.

Adding to this: what went wrong is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei2 points·9 months ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/darkspot

Where the failure reports live. Orders that never arrived, tests that came back at 61%, side effects that ended someone's run, money lost to group buys, and decisions people would not make again. Heavily moderated for cruelty, not for pessimism.

16kmembers
62submissions
Jul 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/darkspot
c/darkspot rules
  1. No piling on. Someone posting a mistake is doing the community a favour.
  2. Still evidence-based: what went wrong, when, and what you can show.
  3. No "told you so" comments. They are removed without discussion.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/burned_once_twiceu/reta_and_regretu/ledger_modu/devils_advocate_d
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →