[Discussion] the personal import advice in here is 17 years out of date
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: seizure matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 10 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 13 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
the personal import status depends on what happens at the border
Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.
the customs status depends on what happens at the border
the customs status depends on what happens at the border
Adding to this: jurisdiction is doing more work than the comment implies.
the customs status depends on what happens at the border Adding to this: jurisdiction is doing more work than the comment implies.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 2 weeks to accept.
Week 91 for me and the honest summary is: 32kg down, nausea manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
Slight fix: the number was 97.2, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
seizure and reship are different outcomes
customs holds vary by season
Yeah, Denmark rules are not global.
Yeah, Denmark rules are not global.
Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
no advice on evading inspection or misdeclaring
- 1it is in the wiki actually7 comments in this branch · started by u/rekha_mbeki
- 2the customs status depends on what happens at the border5 comments in this branch · started by u/anders_vermeulen