[Question] crypto — what am I missing here
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on crypto in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
no price talk, no tickers, no investment discussion
the 19% discount versus 27% network fees
no group-buy recruitment, discussing how they fail is fine
chargeback rights are gas fees: zero
This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
Adding to this: confirmations is doing more work than the comment implies.
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo Adding to this: confirmations is doing more work than the comment implies.
Adding to this: escrow is doing more work than the comment implies.
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
USDC exists on 16 networks, vendor credits are network-specific
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Yeah, the network selection matters most.
Sent orfo payment to the wrong chain. Germany, wrong network, vendor could not credit it. 6 day lesson.
memo/tag requirements differ by network
memo/tag requirements differ by network
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
chargeback rights are crypto: zero
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
confirmations are crypto, the exchange rate at 14 blocks is the deal
Group buy used escrow. 16 people, 3 shipped without drama. Escrow is the insurance.
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
Strongly agree.
Disagree on that part. 94.2% and 95.1% on the same vial is normal.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
memo/tag requirements differ by network
- 1The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…5 comments in this branch · started by u/rasmus_kuipers
- 2network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo5 comments in this branch · started by u/niels_lindqvist