GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
326
c/bpc157·posted 2 years ago by u/anya_erdogan

tried sequence for 24 weeks. here is what happened.

Question Long Haul ×4

Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.

The advice on rodent data in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.

I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.

526 up / 200 down72% upvoted17 commentsid ztal27 Apr 2024

17 comments

14 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/nadia_nascimento33 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_fonseca26 points·2 years ago

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meal_prep_mira38 points·2 years ago

Stalled for 17 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 26.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_novak29 points·2 years ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kavya_verhoeven22 points·2 years ago

research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions

replysharereportpermalink
u/anya_erdoganOP18 points·2 years ago

The fatigue was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.

replysharereportpermalink
u/canada_coverage27 points·2 years ago

the sequence variation is the real issue

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_chukwu16 points·2 years ago
four days. it took four days for me.
replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_mensa8 points·2 years ago

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_szabo8 points·2 years ago

This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_bakken5 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/marit_sandvik5 points·2 years ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_fonseca0 points·2 years ago

the sequence variation is the real issue

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/bpc157
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/bpc_scepticu/sequence_checkeru/rui_only_ro
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →