GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Meta] the sequence rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining — 58 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.9k
c/bpc157·submitted 1 year ago by u/incretin_ivy

[Meta] the sequence rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining

Cautionbranch of 10 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 8 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because…

Read the full submission and all 58 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 1 year ago
u/nikhil_lindqvist87 points·1 year ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivyOPpharmacology0 points·1 year ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/honest_syringe0 points·1 year ago

tendon and pentadecapeptide literature in rodents is interesting

replysharereportpermalink
u/tb500_tangent1 point·1 year ago

the sequence variation is the real issue

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_chukwu1 point·1 year ago

Not to be pedantic but rodent data and tendon are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nils_ferreira1 point·1 year ago

Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox1 point·1 year ago

What was the batch number and which service?

replysharereportpermalink
u/meal_prep_mira71 points·1 year ago·edited

the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only

replysharereportpermalink
u/thandi_solberg45 points·1 year ago·edited

research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivypharmacology13 points·1 year ago

research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions

Adding to this: pentadecapeptide is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.