GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of someone explain tendon to me like I have not read a paper in years — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
260
c/bpc157·submitted 4 months ago by u/piotr_grimaldi

someone explain tendon to me like I have not read a paper in years

Labbranch of 13 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: tendon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 16 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 33 people measuring the same…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

13 comments, started 4 months ago
u/line_petrov18 points·4 months ago

Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.

replysharereportpermalink
u/slow_logbook_ftw6 points·4 months ago·edited

Strongly agree.

Adding to this: regulatory is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_kimani9 points·4 months ago

rodent data must be labelled as rodent data

replysharereportpermalink
u/cormac_roos0 points·4 months ago

Small correction: the trial was 15 weeks, not 25. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ayesha_erdogan1 point·4 months ago

Small correction: the trial was 15 weeks, not 25.

Adding to this: regulatory is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_bakken-33 points·4 months ago

regulatory status changed in 12 countries, check yours

replysharereportpermalink
u/food_noise_gonemaintenance2 points·4 months ago

pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (4) →
u/search_before_post4 points·4 months ago

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulen2 points·4 months ago

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/bpc157
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/bpc_scepticu/sequence_checkeru/rui_only_ro
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →