[Results] 67 weeks, 16kg, and A1c was the hard part
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking bloodwork against ApoB for 15 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. ALT is where you catch the liver story early.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
This is correct.
Adding to this: lipids is doing more work than the comment implies.
Same lab both times?
What are your reference ranges?
redact identifying details from lab PDFs before posting
What are your reference ranges?
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 55 weeks to accept.
Yeah, baseline matters more than any later number.
Same lab both times?
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
- 1controversial sort brought me here and it was worth it6 comments in this branch · started by u/cormac_erdogan