[Discussion] can we stop arguing about eGFR until somebody posts a number
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking eGFR against triglycerides for 9 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
eGFR from 13 to 5 is movement, not noise
Is that fasted?
baseline is the most important A1c measurement, you cannot collect it later
Strongly agree. ALT is where you catch the liver story early.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Is that fasted?
Is that fasted?
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
ALT is where the fatty-liver story shows up first
- 1Strongly agree. ALT is where you catch the liver story early.5 comments in this branch · started by u/lipid_panel_larry