u/yara_antonsen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Tours.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on the ALT thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/bloodwork · -38 points · 1 year ago
eGFR noise on rapid loss is real. 3 week noise, 22 week trend. Do not panic at week 58.
comment on the ALT thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/bloodwork · 150 points · 1 year ago
Ferritin tanked from 18 to 9. Small appetite, reduced iron intake, nobody was testing it until I asked.
comment on why does nobody talk about related substances in c/coa · 6 points · 1 year ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on someone explain goal to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 19 points · 1 year ago
include timeframe and starting point or it is a brag with no info
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for eGFR posts in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 1 year ago
baseline is the most important A1c measurement, you cannot collect it later
comment on goal weight — 16 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 11 points · 1 year ago
food noise returns but not always immediately
comment on goal weight — 16 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 29 points · 1 year ago
the 2.4mg dose works fine for 55 weeks of the month
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #3 — Germany, 3 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1aus · 87 points · 1 year ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on [PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/progresspics · 328 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Process matters more than the number.
comment on reading batch threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/coa · 428 points · 1 year ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on why does nobody talk about lipids in c/bloodwork · 22 points · 1 year ago
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on why does nobody talk about lipids in c/bloodwork · 19 points · 1 year ago
redact identifying details from lab PDFs before posting
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on why does nobody talk about lipids in c/bloodwork · 42 points · 1 year ago
ALT is where the fatty-liver story shows up first
comment on switched from 12.5mg to 0.5mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/coa · 127 points · 1 year ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on goal — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/progresspics · 150 points · 2 years ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on [Vendor] QST order #7 — Denmark, 29 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/coa · 714 points · 2 years ago
Small correction: the trial was 3 weeks, not 28. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for BPC-157 posts in c/bpc157 · 83 points · 2 years ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on goal weight is the most under-discussed thing in c/trialwatch in c/maintenancephase · 30 points · 2 years ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on [Discussion] the Australia advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/glp1aus · 19 points · 2 years ago
AU or NZ?
comment on [Question] struggle — what am I missing here in c/progresspics · 1 points · 2 years ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Canada.