u/valeria_cardoso
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Lagos.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
Comments — page 3 of 3
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 6 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 7 points · 1 year ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify VendorInvestigate in c/vendorvetting · 8 points · 1 year ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on tried interval stretching for 15 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tapering · 1 points · 1 year ago
appetite return timelines vary regain
comment on 7 months in and fertility is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1women · 253 points · 1 year ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on 7 months in and fertility is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1women · 133 points · 1 year ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.0, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on testing: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/vendorvetting · 26 points · 1 year ago
BCH took 22 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on help me understand appetite return, I have read the wiki twice in c/tapering · 38 points · 1 year ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on anyone else notice discontinuation kicking in around week 29 in c/tapering · 42 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. The regain is expected.
comment on [Discussion] the discontinuation advice in here is 20 years out of date in c/tapering · 1 points · 2 years ago
the UK here. Waited 19 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about method development in c/hplc · 1 points · 2 years ago
area% and mass% are not the same and this whole post conflates them
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 79 weeks to accept.
comment on tried reship for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/vendorvetting · 39 points · 2 years ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is Medutest. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on 8 months in and chromatogram is still the thing I get wrong in c/hplc · 627 points · 2 years ago
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful
comment on [Lab] 20th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/vendorvetting · 10 points · 2 years ago
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard